Showing posts with label bail out. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bail out. Show all posts

Saturday, November 12, 2011

The West's tragedy of capital




While Rome burns citizens should not fiddle, but believe another world may be possible and work together for that world. Pepe Escobar



 The one per cent's counter-revolution against protests has begun, and 'it will be beyond ruthless' [GALLO/GETTY] Here's a crash course on global finance 2.0. The debt is in the Atlanticist, wealthy North. The resources are in the global South. And the (reluctant) supreme banker of the last resort is the Middle Kingdom, as personified by the Almighty Hu (Jintao).

The name of the game - Marx revisited by Occupy the World - is class struggle. It's casino capitalism, aka finance turbo-neoliberalism, as practiced by a liquid modernity elite of one per cent, versus the have-a-little-something, have-nots and have-nothing, aka the 99 per cent. There could not be a more graphic demonstration than last week's Greek tragedy takeover of the Cannes debt festival of Slavoj Zizek's thesis that the marriage of capitalism and democracy is over.

If there is something capable of terminally terrorising the European Union (EU) oligarchy it is the concept of a popular referendum. How dare you consult the "rabble" about our Austerity Forever policy, the only one capable of satisfying the financial markets! This is enough to make unelected zombies such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Mario Draghi (formerly vice-president of Goldman Sachs International), European Council President Herman van Rompuy (member of the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg club) and European Commission (EC) head Joao Manuel Barroso to dream of a drone-heavy, Special Forces-filled, NATO no-fly zone to enforce their will.

 Surrender or else The made in Frankfurt ECB screenplay is brought to you by the TINA ("there is no alternative") school. The dull, monochromatic action predictably mixes savage privatisations with social devastation. "Democratic" Europe functions just like in good old Brezhnev times; a troika - IMF, ECB, UE - exercising totalitarian rule, even if in a shambolic way. "'Merkozy' - that mongrel/robotic cross-pollination... can only emit a baleful cry: 'Coon ... traaaact'." "Merkozy" - that mongrel/robotic cross-pollination of German Prime Minister Angela Merkel and neo-Napoleonic French President Nicolas Sarkozy - can emit only a baleful cry: "Coon .... traaact". "Coon ... traaaact" - as in EU-prescribed endless monetary and fiscal contraction.
 It doesn't matter that Italy has a primary surplus. It doesn't matter that Italy's combined private and public debt is 250 per cent of its GDP - much lower than France, the UK, the US and Japan. Italy is now under the volcano because the EU "Cooon ... traaact" monster has thrown it into recession. And regime change won't make it any less different. No wonder the top candidate for succeeding Prime Minister Silvio "bunga bunga" Berlusconi is Mario Monti; a former top director at the EC, European president of the Trilateral Commission and a member of the Bilderberg group. Yet another quintessential one per cent luminary. "Europe" - as in a sub-sect of Franco-German oligarchies - thought the eurozone could be saved by the Orwellian-named European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF). But now even that blob - which is nothing but a bunch of "guarantees" lavished on a shell company in Luxembourg - is about to be devoured by the Supreme Zombie, the God of the Market. So a monster bailout fund set up as a Goldman Sachs-style racket now risks being in dire need of a bailout itself. You can't make this stuff up - even in Hollywood.



Meanwhile, the IMF's bag lady, the sartorially irreprehensible Christine Lagarde, is currently hitting BRICS members Russia and China for some pocket money. But Madame Lagarde, mired in soliloquy with her Dior buttons, knows very well this won't fly, and it won't be enough to "save" the model the IMF, the ECB and "Merkozy" insist on applying. Look South, young man The global indignados - from Greece and Spain to the US and beyond - at least are very much aware of the one per cent's machinations. As in learning about the astonishing performance of Goldman Sachs' commodities index - the top traded across the world. This quintessential one per cent index doubles and even triples the cost of wheat, rice and corn, thus plunging hundreds of millions among the 99 per cent across the globe into terminal hunger. How not to think that another world must be possible? The only solution to the recession the one per cent can come up with is austerity for the 99 per cent [GALLO/GETTY] The Occupy the World 99 per cent are dreamers in a very May 1968 sense - "be realist, demand the impossible". Dreamers in a refreshingly horizontal - not vertical or pyramidal - way. They want to rescue politics - when politicians have lost all legitimacy - as a debate of ideas, not egos or ideology. The pathetic G20 farce last week showed once again they're right. They want a Republic of common sense. They want a popular assembly in every neighbourhood and every village. Against money as a moral value and casino finance as an irate God, they want to rescue the power of collective intelligence. What they need now is to reach critical mass all across the world.

In a sense, it's as if there's been a collective reading of Albert Camus's The Rebel, published six decades ago. The one per cent of the time very much despised what they saw as a little Algerian, son of a domestic worker and without a diploma, posing as a philosopher. But way before the Google and Twitter generation Camus showed how revolt inevitably migrates from the individual to a collective response, enshrined in his beautiful formulation "I revolt, therefore we are". Yet make no mistake. Turbo-capital's one per cent counter-revolution is already on - and it will be beyond ruthless. History shows that every crisis of capitalism is "solved" by outright repression. What's pressing is the search for effective strategies. This includes everything from calls for a general strike to the debate preceding the creation of new political groups. We are all responsible South America, which has outlived torrents of IMF's dreadful "structural adjustments" and is now slowly forging its integration and independence, always denied by the neocolonial one per cent and their local satraps, can be quite helpful.

In a very enlightening discussion with leaders of the Brazilian MST - the Landless Peasant Movement, one of the most important social movements in the world - they explained to me how they have adjusted from fighting for an agrarian reform to fighting a much more nuanced battle against the current, powerful transnational agro-business interests who have forged an intricate alliance with the Lula government. "[For the] irresponsible citizenship... the exercise of political rights is just a ceremony of renouncing political will." - Alvaro Garcia Linera This shows how even a broad social movement with an enormous popular base has to be constantly calibrating its strategic struggle. On a parallel front, there must be an urgent English translation of La Potencia Plebeya ("The Plebeian Power"), a collection of essays by Bolivian vice-president Alvaro Garcia Linera, one of the most crucial intellectuals at work in Latin America. Linera essentially charges how the one per cent and its minions have "sold" the concept of public interest as a separate sphere of civil society. And how civil society can only exist as political if subordinated to mediators or political priests. This, Linera argues, is an archaism that goes back to Hobbes and Montesquieu. And the 99 per cent should be aware of it - and fight it. Linera coins the concept of "irresponsible citizenship" to describe the discombobulated voting masses under the spell of a neoliberal farce. For the "irresponsible citizenship", the "exercise of political rights is just a ceremony of renouncing political will, and will to govern, to place it in the hands of a new caste of private proprietors of politics, which attribute to themselves the knowledge of sophisticated and impenetrable techniques of ruling and governing". So the crucial fight is against these "private proprietors of politics" - and their one per cent masters, be it in Cairo or Manhattan, Madrid or Lahore. G20? Forget it; it's more like G7 billion. If we are truly indignados towards a system that must be toppled, we are all responsible.

Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times. His latest book is named Obama Does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009). The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.

source//// al jazeera

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Facebook, Goldman Sachs and Giant Squid.

When Mark Zuckerberg, the 26 year old founder of Facebook was named Time Magazine's Person of the Year in mid December 2010, it came as quite a suprise to most people. Ok, so Facebook has spread rampantly around the world and become the most powerful social media platform and "The Social Media" film loosely based on the story of Facebook has been a box office hit this year, but there still wasn't much of a sense of strong feeling towards Zuckerberg
In the Time:Person of The Year readers poll, Zuckerberg came in at 10th, with Julian Assange getting far and away the most votes, beating Zuckerberg by many orders of magnitude.

Time: Person Of The Year Readers Poll Top 10
Julian Assange
Recep Tayyip Erdogan
Lady Gaga
Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert
Glenn Beck
Barack Obama
Steve Jobs
The Chilean Miners
The Unemployed American
Mark Zuckerberg



But it started to make a little more sense after yesterdays announcement [3/1/11] that Goldman Sachs had invested in Facebook to the tune of $45Billion, valuing Facebook now at a cool $50Billion and overtaking Google in its reach.
So why exactly is Facebook worth so much to Goldman Sachs, the most profitable investment banking organisation, [or "vulture capitalists" as they're called by numerous politicians and commentators] ?? Surely it's not because they're interested in watching people play Farmville or seeing their messy drunk photos..


Goldman Sachs have been described by The Rolling Stone as "a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money". Their $1Trillion portfolio broadly comprises Investment Banking [ Financial Advisory (mergers and acquisitions, investitures, corporate defence activities, restructuring and spin-offs) and Underwriting (public offerings and private placements of equity, equity-related and debt instruments)], Trading and Principal Investments [ [interest rate and credit products, mortgage-backed securities and loans, currencies and commodities, structured and derivative products, trading in equities, equity-related products, equity derivatives, structured products and executing client trades in equities, options, and futures contracts on world markets, merchant banking investments and funds ], and Asset Management and Securities Services [investment advisory and financial planning services, investment products, clearing, financing, custody, securities lending, reporting services to institutional clients, hedge funds, mutual funds, and pension funds. The division generates revenues primarily in the form of interest rate spreads or fees ] Their assets include major power and gas utilities, oil companies, health care, casino, insurance, financial trading and debt consolidation companies, meat processing factories, hotel chains amongst others, and they are involved in advising and brokering on in such deals as the privatization of major highways in Indiana, Texas and Chicago and selling them to foreign investors. A significant sector of their profit share comes from controlling financial interest in trading and principal investments on things like interest rates, credit products, mortgage-backed securities and loans- many of which were the kind of high risk, high return sub-prime loans that brought about the advent of the global financial crisis. So culpable were Goldman Sachs in promoting unfair home loans that they were investigated by the Massachusetts attorney general’s office. As there are a significant number of former Goldman Sachs employees who have gone on to hold key position in the U.S. administration, notably including Henry Paulson who was the Treasury Secretary from 2006-2009, some noses could have been put out of joint and so on May 10, 2009, Goldman Sachs paid $60Million to end the investigation.
It was the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the global financial services company that had greedily relied too heavily on the high risk sub-prime mortgages, that had brought the global financial crisis into effect, bringing the financial world to it's knees. When asked whether the U.S. treasury should have stepped forward to save the bank, Henry Paulson, [yes the same Henry Paulson who is former CEO, significant share holder, and hedge fund controller of Goldman Sachs.. responded saying,"I never once considered that it was appropriate to put taxpayer money on the line [in resolving Lehman Brothers]". This was on the 15th of Sept 2008.

However on the evening of the 16th of September 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank announced that the New York division were to bail out A.I.G. [The American International Group, the American Insurance Corporation]. Even though Goldman Sachs had seen the crisis coming and had off-loaded a lot of their junk-loans, doing quite well for themselves in the process, and were well insured they could have 'potentially' lost billions. Lucky for them, they had their good friend Stephen Friedman, a shareholder and former director of Goldman Sachs on their side as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank, Robert Rubin [who was employed at Goldman Sachs for 26 years ] working as Barak Obama's economic advisor as well, of course, as their homie US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson [ the same Henry Paulson who was named runner up Time: Person Of The Year in regards to the global financial crisis. Time commented, ""if there is a face to this financial debacle, it is now his."] Apparently he and BFF Lloyd Blankfein, current CEO of Goldman Sachs, were on the phone in the order of 24 times a day when the AIG deal was being negotiated. The list of former Goldman Sachs executives that have gone on to hold key positions in the U.S.administration and other powerful global institutions is long and exhaustive and has earned them the nickname "Government Sachs".

But so that it didn't seem SO flagrantly corrupt, the crafty devils at Goldman Sachs cooked the books in December 2008, shifting large write-downs to create an "orphan month'- reporting a net loss of USD $780Million for the month along with net profit of USD $ 1.81Billion for Jan-March. Boo hoo.. But miraculously the next quarter was significantly higher than average, and with the millions of dollars worth of taxpayers money that they got through the AIG deal, they paid themselves million dollar bonuses and at the end of 2009 reported it's most profitable year ever.


Naturally this enraged the American people who had lost their homes, jobs, pension funds and investments and were going to suffer the effects of cutbacks on social services that stem from the governments USD $12 Trillion [yes, that's trillion with a "T"] bail out package for greedy bankers who had recklessly gambled with their money.

Michael Moore lead a protest outside the Goldman Sachs headquarters, demanding that the bailout money be put back in the American Trust. Goldman Sachs were non-responsive.

Lloyd C. Blankfein [who takes home at least USD $68 Million per annum, not to speak of bonuses..] is aware that people would jump for joy if he were to slit his wrists, though remains self-righteous. “We’re very important,” he chortled in an interview with The Times of London. “We help companies to grow by helping them to raise capital. Companies that grow create wealth. This, in turn, allows people to have jobs that create more growth and more wealth. It’s a virtuous cycle.”
"We're just doing God's work", he glibly remarks.
While this apparently was his idea of a joke, it is even more of a joke that Goldman Sachs representatives endeavour to convince people that this is true. Speaking at a discussion about morality and markets [and I haven't even gotten to the punch line..] at St. Paul’s Cathedral in London, Brian Griffiths [ Goldman Sachs' international vice chairman and former advisor to Margaret Thatcher ] sermonised that giant paychecks for bankers were an 'economic necessity', saying, “We have to tolerate the inequality as a way to achieve greater prosperity and opportunity for all,”.
Excuse me?? We have to ...tolerate the inequality... as a way to achieve greater prosperity and opportunity for all??
That sounds like the biggest load of nonsensical, hypocritical bollocks to me.
Goldman Sachs is the sort of company that has artificially fixed food trading prices for increased profit, resulting in starvation amongst many, and it has proven it's track record of moral bankruptcy on scores of occasions.
This is why people ought to be very concerned about the fact that they now have a major controlling interest in Facebook. There has been a steady erosion of civic legal rights to privacy and protection since 9/11, and social media platforms have lured millions of people around the world to give over access to their personal information, essentially making the line between public and private disappear. Facebook have already demonstrated that they cannot be trusted to protect your personal information, and profit from data-mining, surveillance, and tracking the data-trail of your every move online.
To hand this kind of power over to an enormous company that already has the world over a barrel in almost as many ways as possible has terrible implications. It is simply too much power for one entity to have, and there is too much likelihood that this power will be abused.
People can take that power back by choosing to disengage from their enterprises, and realising that they have a choice.
I personally will be committing Facebook suicide and suggest that you think about doing so as well.

Peace


http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/255237/november-11-2009/goldman-sachs-does-god-s-work

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6907681.ece?token=null&offset=0&page=1
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2009/03/11/98586.htm
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2009/03/16/98729.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/business/28melt.html?_r=1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Goldman_Sachs_Group,_Inc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Paulson
http://newsfeed.time.com/2010/12/13/julian-assange-readers-choice-for-times-person-of-the-year-2010/#ixzz1A84MEZ5a
http://www.pcworld.com/article/213763/facebooks_zuckerberg_is_times_person_of_the_year.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailout
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_International_Group
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Goldman_Sachs_Group,_Inc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%932010
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-a-palermo/lloyd-blankfein-still-doi_b_551301.html
http://onlinedocumentaries.softarchive.net/bbc_two_the_love_of_money_part_back_from_the_brink_dvdrip_documentary.105212.html